Sunday, June 17, 2012
Western Media especially the US are jealous of China Success in Space Program
I have not been writing much lately as the China bashing has tone down quite a fair bit.
First of all. congratulations to China, once again, for pursuing a space program to put a Space Station in space.
I would also like to extend the resolve and strong determination of the Chinese people to develop its own space basic technology, without assistance of the Western powers, who are so bloody afraid to share its sacred technology for two main reasons:
1. China is govern by a one-party autocratic government and Communist..of which the US people has a very clear phobia because they perceived themselves to represent the other extreme...liberty and full of righteous behaviour..which I really doubt so other than controlled by the media and the few so-called bright Congressman. 2. China is not a Cacausion based country..sad but true..even Japanese who worship the West so much cannot even buy the latest jets from USA. Why? Because they are not CAUCASIAN based country..as simple as that. I am not a racist..but this is the sad fact.
China, which has been left out of the Space Station activities because of who? YES. You are damn right. The stiff opposition of the main domineering partner and self appointed POLICEMAN of the world, the US and nobody else. Even the Russians had at one time suggested inviting the Chinese but it was SINGLY SHOT DOWN by the USA.
China has proven that it can develop its own space technology albeit 40 years late but it is always BETTER LATE THAN NEVER and that NO NATION WILL IMPART ANY MILITARY BASED TECHNOLOGY TO YOU. With that, I think the Chinese has got this right.
Most Western Media are quite receptive of the Chinese success in its space program except CNN and TIME magazine, two biggest media conglomerate from non other than the US. Time has sarcastically suggested that Chinese SPACE TECHNOLOGY is so backward and that the US and the Soviets have mastered it 40 years ago and that this feat is just a picnic for the US now. This really sound like a tinge of jealously. And it goes on to imply that the acquisition of this high end technology is for military use and nothing else.
It does not matter what the West said, China must develop its own path since there is no sincerity of the West to pass high level technology to you after all, China is still being barred from buying high tech from the West since the Tiananmen Incident in 1989 (23 years ago).
Other than Korean's Samsung, I hope China will provide an alternative to the West in the development of useful and leading edge technology to mankind in the near future.
Saturday, January 28, 2012
Australian Tennis 2012
By China Watcher
I was pleased to note the fantastic recovery of Djokovic in beating Andy Murray at the marathon match which was telecast live on TV. Every time, a British or a US player is unable to retrieve a shot, I will cheer wildly.
I like Serbian, Czech and Russian players, as long as it is not from the USA, UK, Germany, France and Italy which I believe always think very highly of themselves. As for Australians, they are considered neutral.
I wish that there would be more Asian players, particularly more "Li Na" to dominate the tennis scene in the near future.
I was pleased to note the fantastic recovery of Djokovic in beating Andy Murray at the marathon match which was telecast live on TV. Every time, a British or a US player is unable to retrieve a shot, I will cheer wildly.
I like Serbian, Czech and Russian players, as long as it is not from the USA, UK, Germany, France and Italy which I believe always think very highly of themselves. As for Australians, they are considered neutral.
I wish that there would be more Asian players, particularly more "Li Na" to dominate the tennis scene in the near future.
Uighur and Tibetan Affairs are China Internal Policies
By China Watcher
Recently, the press particularly from the Western world are pleased to become the mouthpiece of the Uighurs Independence movement which is located non other then the arch enemies of the Chinese people, the USA.
The press freely claimed that two Uighurs had been sentenced to life and a few other had been put on the death panalty. Where are the evidences? Just listening to the liars from the Uighurs external trouble makers is what I have noted from ATP, CNN and other western media whose credibility are not to be taken at face value.
I like to reiterate that China Xinjiang policies are China's internal affairs for the Chinese to decide and not for the Western world to demand a hearing. If the Uighurs had broken Chinese laws there should be punish to the full extent of the law especially the involvement in the killing of the Han Chinese.
Just like what had also been published these few months on the self-burning of the Tibetans. It is just a stupid idea and I think these people are downright stupid. Maybe, the Han Chinese can just built a square specifically for them it these people want to sacrifice themselves.
The Tibetans can just forget about independence and the Han Chinese numbering 1.3 billion would not allow this even with Western assistance.
By the way, I am a Buddhist and I have no sympathy for the stupid Tibetans.
Recently, the press particularly from the Western world are pleased to become the mouthpiece of the Uighurs Independence movement which is located non other then the arch enemies of the Chinese people, the USA.
The press freely claimed that two Uighurs had been sentenced to life and a few other had been put on the death panalty. Where are the evidences? Just listening to the liars from the Uighurs external trouble makers is what I have noted from ATP, CNN and other western media whose credibility are not to be taken at face value.
I like to reiterate that China Xinjiang policies are China's internal affairs for the Chinese to decide and not for the Western world to demand a hearing. If the Uighurs had broken Chinese laws there should be punish to the full extent of the law especially the involvement in the killing of the Han Chinese.
Just like what had also been published these few months on the self-burning of the Tibetans. It is just a stupid idea and I think these people are downright stupid. Maybe, the Han Chinese can just built a square specifically for them it these people want to sacrifice themselves.
The Tibetans can just forget about independence and the Han Chinese numbering 1.3 billion would not allow this even with Western assistance.
By the way, I am a Buddhist and I have no sympathy for the stupid Tibetans.
Sunday, January 15, 2012
BBC is up to its tricks again
By China Watcher
Yesterday night I was reading the news from BBC on the Taiwan recent concluded Presidential Election, of which Mr. Ma Ying Jeo, the incumbent, has secured another 4 year term, with the majority of the Taiwanese people wanting to continue the peaceful cross straits policies as initiated by Taiwan with the support of the mainland government.
The writer, a person of caucasian origin, obviously does not understand much about the Chinese people by making poor remarks and insinuating that President Ma policies towards China is too "friendly" and this cause a drop in the popularity vote from 58% to 51%. If analysis was carefully done, it is important to note that there is a third candidate from the ruling Kuomintang party which may have taken some of the votes from Mr. Ma. The DPP's candidate only managed to garner 46%, which is not much of an improvement. I believe this chap and most of the Western media, do have obvious hidden agenda to instigate and divide the Chinese people so that the threat towards Western civilization is minimized.
There is no other way but for Taiwan to peacefully co-exist with China whose people shared a common bond, both with cultural and language similarities until a solution can be found perhaps, in the next 50 years.
It is up to the Chinese people and only Chinese people alone who will decide the outcome of what is to happen to China and Taiwan. So my advice, is for people of caucasian origin to stop interfering with the affairs of the Chinese people.
Yesterday night I was reading the news from BBC on the Taiwan recent concluded Presidential Election, of which Mr. Ma Ying Jeo, the incumbent, has secured another 4 year term, with the majority of the Taiwanese people wanting to continue the peaceful cross straits policies as initiated by Taiwan with the support of the mainland government.
The writer, a person of caucasian origin, obviously does not understand much about the Chinese people by making poor remarks and insinuating that President Ma policies towards China is too "friendly" and this cause a drop in the popularity vote from 58% to 51%. If analysis was carefully done, it is important to note that there is a third candidate from the ruling Kuomintang party which may have taken some of the votes from Mr. Ma. The DPP's candidate only managed to garner 46%, which is not much of an improvement. I believe this chap and most of the Western media, do have obvious hidden agenda to instigate and divide the Chinese people so that the threat towards Western civilization is minimized.
There is no other way but for Taiwan to peacefully co-exist with China whose people shared a common bond, both with cultural and language similarities until a solution can be found perhaps, in the next 50 years.
It is up to the Chinese people and only Chinese people alone who will decide the outcome of what is to happen to China and Taiwan. So my advice, is for people of caucasian origin to stop interfering with the affairs of the Chinese people.
Saturday, January 14, 2012
Malaysian Sports Media tried to provoke hate against Chinese Badminton Players
By China Watcher
Chinese badminton players have been dominating the international badminton circuit in almost all major badminton tournament leaving the rest of the countries behind. Malaysia, an avid badminton nation with lots of fans, has yet to uncover any world unbeatable player. The only bright spark is that it has a gem in the name of Lee Chong Wei. The rest of the players just make up the numbers.
What the Malaysian media failed to realize is that although the number of people playing badminton is probably a sizeable million but when compared to China it is as high as the population of Malaysia, that is, around 28 million. So the vast talents can be uncovered from the big base.
But Malaysian media always write to think very highly of its only "GEM' and sometimes it has become more like a self pleasing exercise.
And these media always tried to stir up rivalry between its no 1 men single player and the rest of the Chinese badminton players. Even the crowd at the current Malaysian Open is not there to support the better player but to create an anti-Chinese environment.
I do understand Chong Wei is a good player but then the media is singing so loud as though he is the best player (men single) in the world. Though the world's fan voted him as the most popular player, I sense that the poll did not take into consideration the Chinese voting public since the world badminton site does not have a mirror in mandarin. So we can actually discount the popularity poll which is taken only from the english speaking crowd.
To me, as a badminton fan myself, Lin Dan is still the best player in the world.
Chinese badminton players have been dominating the international badminton circuit in almost all major badminton tournament leaving the rest of the countries behind. Malaysia, an avid badminton nation with lots of fans, has yet to uncover any world unbeatable player. The only bright spark is that it has a gem in the name of Lee Chong Wei. The rest of the players just make up the numbers.
What the Malaysian media failed to realize is that although the number of people playing badminton is probably a sizeable million but when compared to China it is as high as the population of Malaysia, that is, around 28 million. So the vast talents can be uncovered from the big base.
But Malaysian media always write to think very highly of its only "GEM' and sometimes it has become more like a self pleasing exercise.
And these media always tried to stir up rivalry between its no 1 men single player and the rest of the Chinese badminton players. Even the crowd at the current Malaysian Open is not there to support the better player but to create an anti-Chinese environment.
I do understand Chong Wei is a good player but then the media is singing so loud as though he is the best player (men single) in the world. Though the world's fan voted him as the most popular player, I sense that the poll did not take into consideration the Chinese voting public since the world badminton site does not have a mirror in mandarin. So we can actually discount the popularity poll which is taken only from the english speaking crowd.
To me, as a badminton fan myself, Lin Dan is still the best player in the world.
Thursday, October 13, 2011
China miserable soccer fortunes continue
By China Watcher
China struggles again in a soccer match with Iraq on home ground in a 2014's Asia World Cup qualifier yesterday, losing 0-1 to a team who did not even have a competitive soccer league given that the country has gone through some civil strife a decade ago.
It is a common sight to see the despair on the football fans faces who came to support its team after the first round knockout of its soccer team from the Olympic qualifiers.
I still strongly believe that the future of Chinese soccer is in the youth programs and if there is to be a change in fortunes then we must see some strong wins against the teams from South Korea, Japan and the Middle Eastern countries at the Junior level - U16, U-19 and Youth, But then there is no current performance even to justify that the future of Chinese soccer is indeed encouraging.
There is a need to revamp the Chinese structure in the development of soccer towards one in which the players are motivated to take risks, develop individual skills and most important to learn the basics of kicking and passing the ball to its team mates. China need to learn from Korea and Japan and it is important to do it fast, otherwise they will continue to lose or just draw with the Middle Eastern countries like Syria, Jordan, Qatar, Iraq and Iran.
Just watch how the Japanese, Korean and the Australian players who always have the upper hand when they deal with the Middle Eastern style of play which I think is not superior than the speedy work rate of the East Asian teams.
China struggles again in a soccer match with Iraq on home ground in a 2014's Asia World Cup qualifier yesterday, losing 0-1 to a team who did not even have a competitive soccer league given that the country has gone through some civil strife a decade ago.
It is a common sight to see the despair on the football fans faces who came to support its team after the first round knockout of its soccer team from the Olympic qualifiers.
I still strongly believe that the future of Chinese soccer is in the youth programs and if there is to be a change in fortunes then we must see some strong wins against the teams from South Korea, Japan and the Middle Eastern countries at the Junior level - U16, U-19 and Youth, But then there is no current performance even to justify that the future of Chinese soccer is indeed encouraging.
There is a need to revamp the Chinese structure in the development of soccer towards one in which the players are motivated to take risks, develop individual skills and most important to learn the basics of kicking and passing the ball to its team mates. China need to learn from Korea and Japan and it is important to do it fast, otherwise they will continue to lose or just draw with the Middle Eastern countries like Syria, Jordan, Qatar, Iraq and Iran.
Just watch how the Japanese, Korean and the Australian players who always have the upper hand when they deal with the Middle Eastern style of play which I think is not superior than the speedy work rate of the East Asian teams.
Sunday, September 11, 2011
China should downgrade its relations with Mexico
By China Watcher
Ever since the current Mexican President ascent to power, he has been promoting a-Western centric values closed to the US and his directions and diplomacy have always been anti-Chinese ranging from economic partnership and working against the good of the Chinese people.
By meeting the CIA sponsored Dalai Lama on 9 September 2011 he is sending a clear message to the Chinese government and its people that he could not care less for the feelings of the Chinese people including in large the overseas Chinese people as well.
The only plausible way the Chinese government could do is to downgrade this country relationship or if possible, use its international influence to “isolate” business activities with the Mexican government. I do not see any importance of promoting an economic relationship with the corrupt Mexican government as whatever goods and services produced are competing with China.
It is important as it could send a very powerful message to the world community.
Ever since the current Mexican President ascent to power, he has been promoting a-Western centric values closed to the US and his directions and diplomacy have always been anti-Chinese ranging from economic partnership and working against the good of the Chinese people.
By meeting the CIA sponsored Dalai Lama on 9 September 2011 he is sending a clear message to the Chinese government and its people that he could not care less for the feelings of the Chinese people including in large the overseas Chinese people as well.
The only plausible way the Chinese government could do is to downgrade this country relationship or if possible, use its international influence to “isolate” business activities with the Mexican government. I do not see any importance of promoting an economic relationship with the corrupt Mexican government as whatever goods and services produced are competing with China.
It is important as it could send a very powerful message to the world community.
Thursday, September 8, 2011
The Chinese ways to counter the US continued challenge to China’s rise as an economic and military superpower in the Asia Pacific region.
By China Watcher
The US (and not America because the US do not represent the continent of America) empire as many critics say is heading on a declining slope due to its massive debt and the poor performance of its economy – which is heavily reliant on technological improvisation. What happens if the technological barrier has been lowered (other countries can innovate better) or the technological development has reached a plateau over the next few decades.
The US is very eager to see that its dominant superpower status is not in any way challenge by a growing China. China must realize that after the cold war ended, the Pacific Ocean became, in effect, a US haven. With its air and naval forces operating through bases in subordinate satellite countries like Japan, Philippines and South Korea.The United States believe that it could continue to deter its labeled aggressors and to insure safe passage for commercial shipping throughout the Western Pacific and into the Indian Ocean. Recently, it has started engaging Vietnam (a former enemy) and Singapore (a pro-US city State) to allow it to make port calls with the hope of creating future satellite naval bases to deter China movements in the South China Sea. The US forces presently is the only power which could operate everywhere with impunity.
Western media keeps generating various reports that China has over two decades engaged in the fast and wide-ranging military buildup which threatened not the US but also the surrounding countries. Though China is secretive about its military improvements, it is no different when it comes to the US. Did the US ever notify the world community why it needed 11 aircraft carriers to patrol the world?
China must continue to build on its “anti-access capability” and focus on more cost-effective ways to neutralize US capability in coming to the aid of nations which have been taking orders from the superpower. The building of a large number of relatively inexpensive non-nuclear ballistic missiles inclusive of sea- and air-launched cruise missiles is a good strategic move in the right direction. The important thing here is to make these weapons more precise, powerful and deadly in order not to allow the US the time to recoup and launch counter attacks. These weapons must be able to destroy or disable the satellite ports and airfields (like in Japan and Korea) from which US air and naval forces operate and sink warships with weapons that could reach an area from hundreds of miles out to sea, more particular the might of US aircraft carriers.
More developments are needed in the area of space technologies to accurately disable US satellites and cyber-networks which will “blind” the US military vision in high tech war. China should also continue to develop more potent long-range nuclear missiles that can easily reach the United States in the event of an attack from the US. The strategic direction is to minimize the “windows” or options for Washington to retaliate in an outbreak of hostilities leading to a war.
China must develop a strong détente with its improvement in all its military armaments in such a way that any US satellites states which allow its bases to be used in launching a war against the Chinese people (esp Korea, Japan and Philippines) will run the risk of being annihilated WITH OR WITHOUT the US support. It is important to create this atmosphere of uncertainty on the reliance for the US support which will prompt these countries to consider carefully before embarking on any war against the Chinese people.
China must continue to take its rightful place as Asia’s dominant power. It can do so in 2 ways by co-existing with the US or by eroding the credibility of America’s security guarantees, hollowing out its many military alliances and eventually easing it out of the region.
China is stating its claims to the various contested areas around South China Sea and Japan more on the basis of what has been written in the historical context based on 16th century maps but the surrounding countries have suddenly become bolder to challenge Chinese sovereign interest, mainly because of the US support from within.
Western media reporting have always been lopsided and branding China as the “aggressors”. Why? It is no surprise since most online and printed media are from the West. The West has stated that strength deters aggression and weakness tempts it, which I wholeheartedly agreed. Beijing must continue to build a more aggressive and efficient military like what the US had done over the last 100 years in order to bring about peace and stability in Asia.
Beijing’s must continue to stress that any nation that work closely with the United States to deter China’s right to takes its own place in Asia is viewed as an ‘unfriendly nation” which will be subjected to the same treatment as an “enemy”.
Can Washington shoulder the entire burden of preserving the Asian power balance, in a declining economic scenario? Can US continue to spend as lavishly to confront China openly to counter its anti-access capabilities, thereby reducing the likelihood that they will ever be used? The West always criticize China’s relentless military buildup but is there anyone who is willing to question the US year by year increase in military spending which is so much higher than the size of China’s military budget?
The US (and not America because the US do not represent the continent of America) empire as many critics say is heading on a declining slope due to its massive debt and the poor performance of its economy – which is heavily reliant on technological improvisation. What happens if the technological barrier has been lowered (other countries can innovate better) or the technological development has reached a plateau over the next few decades.
The US is very eager to see that its dominant superpower status is not in any way challenge by a growing China. China must realize that after the cold war ended, the Pacific Ocean became, in effect, a US haven. With its air and naval forces operating through bases in subordinate satellite countries like Japan, Philippines and South Korea.The United States believe that it could continue to deter its labeled aggressors and to insure safe passage for commercial shipping throughout the Western Pacific and into the Indian Ocean. Recently, it has started engaging Vietnam (a former enemy) and Singapore (a pro-US city State) to allow it to make port calls with the hope of creating future satellite naval bases to deter China movements in the South China Sea. The US forces presently is the only power which could operate everywhere with impunity.
Western media keeps generating various reports that China has over two decades engaged in the fast and wide-ranging military buildup which threatened not the US but also the surrounding countries. Though China is secretive about its military improvements, it is no different when it comes to the US. Did the US ever notify the world community why it needed 11 aircraft carriers to patrol the world?
China must continue to build on its “anti-access capability” and focus on more cost-effective ways to neutralize US capability in coming to the aid of nations which have been taking orders from the superpower. The building of a large number of relatively inexpensive non-nuclear ballistic missiles inclusive of sea- and air-launched cruise missiles is a good strategic move in the right direction. The important thing here is to make these weapons more precise, powerful and deadly in order not to allow the US the time to recoup and launch counter attacks. These weapons must be able to destroy or disable the satellite ports and airfields (like in Japan and Korea) from which US air and naval forces operate and sink warships with weapons that could reach an area from hundreds of miles out to sea, more particular the might of US aircraft carriers.
More developments are needed in the area of space technologies to accurately disable US satellites and cyber-networks which will “blind” the US military vision in high tech war. China should also continue to develop more potent long-range nuclear missiles that can easily reach the United States in the event of an attack from the US. The strategic direction is to minimize the “windows” or options for Washington to retaliate in an outbreak of hostilities leading to a war.
China must develop a strong détente with its improvement in all its military armaments in such a way that any US satellites states which allow its bases to be used in launching a war against the Chinese people (esp Korea, Japan and Philippines) will run the risk of being annihilated WITH OR WITHOUT the US support. It is important to create this atmosphere of uncertainty on the reliance for the US support which will prompt these countries to consider carefully before embarking on any war against the Chinese people.
China must continue to take its rightful place as Asia’s dominant power. It can do so in 2 ways by co-existing with the US or by eroding the credibility of America’s security guarantees, hollowing out its many military alliances and eventually easing it out of the region.
China is stating its claims to the various contested areas around South China Sea and Japan more on the basis of what has been written in the historical context based on 16th century maps but the surrounding countries have suddenly become bolder to challenge Chinese sovereign interest, mainly because of the US support from within.
Western media reporting have always been lopsided and branding China as the “aggressors”. Why? It is no surprise since most online and printed media are from the West. The West has stated that strength deters aggression and weakness tempts it, which I wholeheartedly agreed. Beijing must continue to build a more aggressive and efficient military like what the US had done over the last 100 years in order to bring about peace and stability in Asia.
Beijing’s must continue to stress that any nation that work closely with the United States to deter China’s right to takes its own place in Asia is viewed as an ‘unfriendly nation” which will be subjected to the same treatment as an “enemy”.
Can Washington shoulder the entire burden of preserving the Asian power balance, in a declining economic scenario? Can US continue to spend as lavishly to confront China openly to counter its anti-access capabilities, thereby reducing the likelihood that they will ever be used? The West always criticize China’s relentless military buildup but is there anyone who is willing to question the US year by year increase in military spending which is so much higher than the size of China’s military budget?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)